Distal protection    A novel, low-profile filter-wire (Interceptor) embolic protection device during saphenous vein graft stenting Am J Cardiol (2005);95:511-4 J. J. Young, et al. Transradial application of PercuSurge GuardWire device during primary percutaneous intervention of infarct-related artery with high-burden thrombus formation Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2004);61:503-11 H. K. Yip, et al. Symptomatic patients have similar outcomes compared with asymptomatic patients after carotid artery stenting with emboli protection Am J Cardiol (2005);95:297-300 M. H. Yen, et al. Six-month angiographic results of primary angioplasty with adjunctive PercuSurge GuardWire device support: Evaluation of the restenotic rate of the target lesion and the fate of the distal balloon occlusion site Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2005);64:35-42 C. J. Wu, et al. Early experience in the application of distal protection devices in treatment of peripheral vascular disease of the lower extremities Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2005);64:227-35 M. H. Wholey, et al. Effectiveness and safety of the Proxis system in demonstrating retrograde coronary blood flow during proximal occlusion and in capturing embolic material Am J Cardiol (2004);94:1134-9 H. Sievert, et al. Effect of two different neuroprotection systems on microembolization during carotid artery stenting J Am Coll Cardiol (2004);44:1966-9 A. Schmidt, et al. Carotid stenting with a new system for distal embolic protection and stenting in high-risk patients: the carotid revascularization with ev3 arterial technology evolution (CREATE) feasibility trial Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2004);63:1-6 R. D. Safian, et al. Embolic protection with filtering or occlusion balloons during saphenous vein graft stenting retrieves identical volumes and sizes of particulate debris Circulation (2004);109:1735-40 C. Rogers, et al. Applicability of distal protection for aortocoronary vein graft interventions in clinical practice Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2004);63:148-51 V. Mathew, et al. Comparison of temporary occlusion and aspiration system versus the conventional method during coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction Am J Cardiol (2004);94:1041-3 T. Kusuyama, et al. Carotid angioplasty under cerebral protection with the PercuSurge GuardWire System Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2004);61:293-305 M. Henry, et al. Determinants of 30-day adverse events following saphenous vein graft intervention with and without a distal occlusion embolic protection device Am J Cardiol (2005);95:173-7 G. R. Giugliano, et al. Prevention of distal embolization and no-reflow in patients with acute myocardial infarction and total occlusion in the infarct-related vessel: A subgroup analysis of the cohort of acute revascularization in myocardial infarction with excimer laser-CARMEL Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2005);64:67-74 J. B. Dahm, et al. Cost-effectiveness of distal embolic protection for patients undergoing percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein bypass grafts: results from the SAFER trial J Am Coll Cardiol (2004);44:1801-8 D. J. Cohen, et al. Safety and feasibility of the use of a distal filter protection device in percutaneous revascularization of small coronary arteries Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2004);61:360-3 W. H. Chen, et al. Distal protection with a filter device during coronary stenting in patients with stable and unstable angina Circulation (2004);110:515-21 A. Angelini, et al.