PTCA and CABG    Improved survival with radial artery versus vein conduits in coronary bypass surgery with left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery grafting Circulation (2004);109:1489-96 A. Zacharias, et al. Is the impact of hospital and surgeon volumes on the in-hospital mortality rate for coronary artery bypass graft surgery limited to patients at high risk? Circulation (2004);110:784-9 C. Wu, et al. One-year coronary bypass graft patency: a randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump surgery angiographic results of the PRAGUE-4 trial Circulation (2004);110:3418-23 P. Widimsky, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions performed at centers without and with onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery Jama (2004);292:1961-8 D. E. Wennberg, et al. One year comparison of costs of coronary surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in the stent or surgery trial Heart (2004);90:782-8 W. S. Weintraub, et al. Surgery may be better than PCI in patients with multivessel disease at high risk Circulation (2004);109:e9043-4 R. SoRelle Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting versus stenting for patients with proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease Am J Cardiol (2004);93:959-62 K. Shirai, et al. Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass grafting for patients with low left ventricular ejection fractions, unstable angina pectoris, and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass (the AWESOME Randomized Trial and Registry Am J Cardiol (2004);94:118-20 S. P. Sedlis, et al. A risk score to estimate the likelihood of coronary artery bypass surgery during the index hospitalization among patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction J Am Coll Cardiol (2004);44:799-803 S. Sadanandan, et al. A comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery with sternotomy J Am Coll Cardiol (2004);43:557-64 M. J. Racz, et al. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial Jama (2004);291:1841-9 J. D. Puskas, et al. Procedural volume as a marker of quality for CABG surgery Jama (2004);291:195-201 E. D. Peterson, et al. Beat goes on in "off-pump" bypass surgery: surgeon experience may be key to best outcome Jama (2004);291:1821-2 M. Mitka On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in a matched sample of women: a comparison of outcomes Circulation (2004);110:II1-6 M. J. Mack, et al. On-pump and off-pump bypass surgery: tools for revascularization Circulation (2004);109:810-2 B. W. Lytle and J. F. Sabik Prolonging patency-choosing coronary bypass grafts N Engl J Med (2004);351:2262-4 B. W. Lytle Impact of delays to cardiac surgery after failed angioplasty and stenting J Am Coll Cardiol (2004);43:337-42 M. Lotfi, et al. Three-year outcome after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease Circulation (2004);109:1114-20 V. M. Legrand, et al. Coronary bypass surgery performed off pump does not result in lower in-hospital morbidity than coronary artery bypass grafting performed on pump Circulation (2004);109:887-92 J. F. Legare, et al. Effect of diabetes and associated conditions on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery Circulation (2004);110:II41-4 B. J. Leavitt, et al. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery N Engl J Med (2004);350:21-8 N. E. Khan, et al. Using the risk of restenosis as a guide to triaging patients between surgical and percutaneous coronary revascularization Circulation (2004);110:II50-4 R. Kettelkamp, et al. Acute and long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of coronary stenting using Palmaz-Schatz stent and ACS Multi-Link stent Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2004);62:453-60 I. C. Hsieh, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation vs. minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) in patients with left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2005);64:75-81 S. J. Hong, et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study J Am Coll Cardiol (2004);44:2149-56 S. Goldman, et al. Neurological complications after coronary artery bypass grafting related to the performance of cardiopulmonary bypass Chest (2004);125:2196-205 Y. M. Ganushchak, et al. Quality of life after coronary artery bypass graft: results from the POST CABG Trial Chest (2004);126:487-95 N. L. Fox, et al. ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Arte J Am Coll Cardiol (2004);44:1146-54, e213-310 Artery Bypass Graft Surgery) ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Arte Circulation (2004);110:1168-76 K. A. Eagle, et al. ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft S Circulation (2004);110:e340-437 K. A. Eagle, et al. Comparison of late (four years) functional health status between percutaneous transluminal angioplasty intervention and off-pump left internal mammary artery bypass grafting for isolated high-grade narrowing of the proximal left anterior descending corona Am J Cardiol (2004);94:1414-7 D. J. Drenth, et al. Single versus multiple internal mammary artery grafting for coronary artery bypass: 15-year follow-up of a clinical practice trial Circulation (2004);110:II27-35 W. R. Burfeind, Jr., et al. Propensity analysis of long-term survival after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and high-risk features Circulation (2004);109:2290-5 S. J. Brener, et al. Directional coronary atherectomy plus stent implantation vs. left internal mammary artery bypass grafting for isolated proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2005);64:45-52 N. Brambilla, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery in multivessel disease? A tailored approach based on coronary pressure measurement Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2004);63:184-91 K. J. Botman, et al. Can percutaneous coronary interventions reduce death and myocardial infarction in stable and unstable coronary disease? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2004);61:528-36 P. J. Best and P. B. Berger Choosing between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with multivessel disease: what can we learn from the Arterial Revascularization Therapy Study (ARTS)? Circulation (2004);109:1079-81 P. B. Berger, et al. Long-term patency of internal mammary artery bypass grafts: relationship with preoperative severity of the native coronary artery stenosis Circulation (2004);110:II36-40 A. Berger, et al. Long-term outcome of isolated coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction Circulation (2004);110:II13-7 J. Appoo, et al. Comparison of three-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary disease, including involvement of the left anterior descending coronary artery proximally (a subanalysis of the arterial Am J Cardiol (2004);94:627-31 J. Aoki, et al. Impact of preoperative intravenous nitroglycerin on in-hospital outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting for unstable angina Am Heart J (2004);148:727-32 I. S. Ali, et al.